Whatever your persuasion is on marijuana , drive under the influence of any drug comes with dangers that everybody should be aware of . Experts are now claiming that “ unscientific ” effectual driving terminus ad quem are hazing the issue and commit some drivers unnecessarily at risk of infection , while leave alone others to be wrongfully convicted .
The enquiry by theAAA Foundation for Traffic Safetysaid that fateful route accidents involve stoned drivers has doubled – from 8 to 17 percent – between 2013 and 2014 , after Washington became one of the first two states to legalize the recreational use of marijuana in December 2012 . They also found one in six drivers involved in fatal crash in 2014 had latterly used marijuana .
In addition , the fresh research suggested that current sound demarcation for drive under the influence of marijuana are immanent and unsupported by scientific discipline .
Some states , include Washington , have set legal limits for the maximum amount of dynamic THC – the main chemical substance chemical compound of marijuana – that drivers can have in their bloodstream . However , find a dependable point of accumulation for drivers has proven to be tough for both lawmakers and scientists .
The upshot of marijuana vary greatly from individual to someone . harmonise to the research worker , one somebody with high levels of THC in their blood may not show signs of afflicted driving , while another with humiliated story of THC in their system may be greatly afflicted . On top of this , many even smoker will have persistent levels of THC long after use , even if they are not in high spirits or impaired at the time .
Additionally , descent test often ca n’t be deal until hours after the mistrust stoned driver has been stop by police force . By this time , THC levels could have importantly drop .
“ There is intelligibly a strong desire by both lawmakers and the public to produce legal demarcation for marijuana impairment , in the same manner as we do with alcohol , ” sound out Marshall Doney , AAA ’s President and CEO , in apress release . “ In the case of marijuana , this approach is blemished and not digest by scientific research . It ’s simply not possible today to find whether a driver is deflower base exclusively on the amount of the drug in their body . ”
Therefore , the AAA hope their inquiry will spur more comprehensive enforcement policies , measures that they say should be based on a two - fold system , whereby drivers must test cocksure for marijuana and show augury of behavioural impairment .
The AAA feel this can be achieved through good training , such as broadcast that learn police on how to recognize drug - mar drivers .
