The trailer for Ridley Scott’sGladiator IIis now out and promise to be an unrivaled cinematic spectacle . If you were a fan of the first film , there is every prospect that you ’ll love the new whizz - studded performance showcasing epical duels , infernal Colosseum battles , and hints of political intrigue . But as with all Hollywood historical epics , you might end up asking how much of what is being portrayed is ground on historical fact and how much is fun fiction ?
We flex our doubt to theBad Ancientteam to get their expert views on the fun , the fantasy , and the fact .
What is the film all about?
The news report of the newGladiatorfilm picks up 25 long time after the events of the first movie . The trailer opens with Lucius Verus II ( spiel by Paul Mescal ) , the son in the original story and boy of Lucilla , recite the fatal affaire d’honneur between Emperor Commodus ( Joaquin Phoenix ) and the gladiator and fallen general Maximus Decimus Meridius ( Russell Crowe ) .
It seems that , in the years observe this event , Lucius is in exile in Numidia , in northwest Africa , and is captured by the papist army , who force him to become a prizefighter . Of course , Lucius wants to work down the Roman order and abolish any form of thralldom .
We later see Lucius fighting the put on General Marcus Acacius ( Pedro Pascal ) , who also seems to have misgiving about the Roman Empire ’s wanton bloodbath . Throughout the trailer , we are further introduced to characters like Macrinus ( Denzel Washington ) , a connive prizefighter - owe power broker , and the gaunt , pallid brother emperors Geta and Caracalla ( played by Joseph Quinn and Fred Hechinger respectively ) , who look roughshod and effete .
Denzel Washington plays Macrinus, a man with apparent ambitions.Image credit: Cuba Scott. © 2024 Paramount Pictures.
The trailer is fill with hints of spectacular shot , like a gladiator free a rhino , a simulated maritime battle in a flooded Colosseum ( staring with boats and man - consume sharks ) , as well as politics and machination .
It ’s a deal . It ’s fun , but how naturalistic is it ?
First things first, what did you think of the trailer?
Dr Jo Ball ( JB),an archaeologist and specialist in Roman battle and engagement : I had been implausibly excited to see the preview for the newGladiator IIfilm , and it did not disappoint , seemingly promising a spectacular ocular feast – hopefully with some nice chronicle throw in ! I am particularly concerned to see the storyline of Pedro Pascal ’s Marcus Acacius , who seem from the laggard to come to dissent the endless conquests of Rome , and the human life it be – and on the face of it to be punished for his purview – with the humanisation of popish generals and the army more wide , a potentially interesting thread play alongside the main gladiator theme .
Alexandra Sills ( AS ) , graduate student at the University of Leicester : It decidedly looks like it will occult the first film in term of virgin spectacle . I ’m excited to see what 24 years of CGI development can bring to a Roman field . I ’m also odd to see how the movie deals with the fact that the Republic has n’t been reinstated . That was the whole grounds Maximus sacrifice himself in the first film , so will Lucius finish the occupation ? We know that emperor moth continue to rule for century , so it ’s unlikely , but it will definitely be interesting to see whether the political slant is continued or overlook completely in favour of a personal revenge story .
Dr Owen Rees ( OR ) , founder and lead editor of Bad Ancient : The originalGladiatoris a film very dear to my heart and soul , so my initial response was Why ? ! Why is there a subsequence ? But then when the cityscape of Rome came on the screen , that answer just melted off and I became occupy in the spectacle on filmdom . I ca n’t expect to see how they link up this to the premature movie and pick up the motif place out – the glory of Rome , the desire for a muted life away from the hub of power , the ideologic beacon of " the Republic " .
Joseph Quinn and Fred Hechinger play the emperors Geta and Caracella.Image credit: Aidan Monaghan. © 2024 PARAMOUNT PICTURES. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Did anything immediately jump out as accurate or inaccurate/anachronistic?
JB : Paul Mescal ’s Lucius appears to have become a gladiator after being bewitch in a vehement subjection of Numidia in northwestern Africa – but this area had been part of the Roman world for 100 by the time the film is jell , and it is difficult to reckon scenes like those shown in the trailer play out as a result of Severan political reorganization in the region ( around the time when the film is set ) .
element of the dress seem problematic , particularly the wristbands that seem to be mandatory for everyone who owns a brand ! The accents are an interesting commixture , but I really quite like this , as it is a utile admonisher that the " Romans " were not a homogenous universe , but came from an imperium that stretched from Britain across Europe , the Near East , and northern Africa – why people would be carry to have the same accents is beyond me ( and even if they did , a modern American accent is no less accurate a theatrical than a Graeco-Roman British one ! ) .
AS : Nobody is topless ! Gladiators wore nothing to protect their torsos , because that would be seen as making the scrap too prosperous . Pedro and Paul should also be post shields , because gladiator carried those rather of having chest armor . The nerveless matter is that the shield could be used offensively , almost like a second arm , and it attain fight more interesting because both arms are in looseness . I can understand not couch far-famed movie stars in helmets that embrace their boldness , but these guys should be showing a lot of unfinished chest . No doubt many in the cinema would n’t mind , either …
The Romans loved a spectacle, but did their simulated maritime battles, known as naumachia, ever involve sharks like the one in the trailer?Image credit: © 2024 PARAMOUNT PICTURES. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Is there a problem with the portrayal of the two emperors?
AS : The characterization of Caracalla and Geta is a bit unknown ; they look and act more like Nero and Caligula stereotypes than the actual Severans . Also , they ’re conspicuously pale : both brothers were in reality half Libyan , half Syrian .
There were many the great unwashed of color in the Roman Catholic humanity , and it ’s a shame to whitewash emperor who we know had dreary tegument . I ’m excited to see Denzel Washington in the cast though , his character seems really intriguing .
OR : They seem to be a impersonation of many " bad emperor moth " rolled into one , and the choice to cast such pale actors is an interesting one in this day and long time . But we shall see when the film add up out how their characters are fleshed out . It is unfair to judge it from a few moments in an advert !
Was the Colosseum ever filled with water and used to stage maritime battles?
JB : dead – naumachiae were popular and spectacular ( if very expensive and logistically challenging ) consequence put on to flirt with the the great unwashed of Rome on special occasion . Naumachiae were stage by the earliest emperor of Rome , although until the reign of Nero , they did n’t take place in coliseum but on lakes or in specially constructed basins . The Colosseum became a dedicated venue for naumachia , and one even featured in its inauguration in 80 AD during the reign of the emperor Titus – but we have little estimation of how they filled the bowl with water for the battle , and it was in all probability done to the minimum level possible to make the ship float !
AS : Paul Mescal ’s character would n’t have defend in naumachia though . Instead of trained ( take – expensive ) gladiators , Romans used prisoners of war and sentence criminals , and we can deduct from this that few were expected to outlive , if any . It ’s also deserving mentioning that the naumachy of Claudius on the Fucine Lake was the only recorded example of participants saying " We who are about to die salute you . " Gladiators did not have to say this .
Would gladiators have actually fought rhinos… or sharks?
JB : popish consultation liked novelty in their animate being show , and there were few animals they would not look at putting in the arena – there was a moneymaking business deal in sourcing animals for this very purpose , and the more exotic , the skillful . The animate being did not even have to be particularly ferocious as long as they were strange – animals like giraffe also featured alongside more " Hellenic " wild brute such as lions or bear .
AS : Gladiators only ever fought other gladiators . But there were multitude who press with or hunted animals in the arena ; they were bed as venatores and bestiarii .
We do know that rhinos were presented in Rome . Pompey Magnus was the first known to import one . The emperor Commodus ( portrayed by Joaquin Phoenix in the first picture show ) had one import so that he himself could down it in the Colosseum ( he shot arrows at it from a platform so that he was never in any danger ) .
As for sharks , we ’re going into fantasy territorial dominion here . The Romans grew very skilled at collecting and transporting all manner of unfounded animals , particularly from Africa , but had no direction of take hold of sharks , bring them to Rome , and keeping them somewhere before a Games . On the other hired hand , if they could have , they doubtless would have and thought it was awesome , so maybe this is cinematic regard fulfilment for dead guys .
OR : Animals were visit in the arena , but it was not the same gladiators who did the fighting . Our term gladiator is an simplism of what the Romans had in the stadium .
